STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2004-14477-W




 

AGREED ORDER

 

The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  The Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this Order.

 

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  The Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  The Respondent is Parker-Hannifin Corporation (“Respondent”), which owns and/or operates a manufacturing facility d/b/a Goshen Rubber, (the “Site”).  The Respondent holds a general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit No. ING250096 for the discharge of non-contact cooling water.  The Site is located at 1525 S. 10th Street, Goshen, Elkhart County, Indiana.

 

3.                  The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”) has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, On March 16, 2006, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to:

 

Donald E. Washkewicz, President

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

d/b/a Goshen Rubber

6035 Parkland Blvd.

Cleveland, Ohio 44124

CT Corporation, Registered Agent

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

d/b/a Goshen Rubber

251 E. Ohio Street, Suite 1100

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

 

5.                  Pursuant to 327 Indiana Administrative Code (“IAC”) 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the State as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit obtained prior to discharge.

 

6.                  On November 10, 2004, a representative of IDEM conducted investigations of a spill of an unknown amount of “Zyglo” brand fluorescent powder dye, which was added to non-contact cooling water discharge to test for leaks in the system.  From the point source discharge, the non-contact cooling water flowed through the Goshen Mill Race Ditch, to the City of Goshen’s storm sewer, and then to Elkhart River.  During IDEM’s investigation, a point source discharge was observed being released from non-contact cooling water to waters of the State.  The Respondent failed to obtain a valid NPDES permit prior to discharging the non-contact cooling water into the waters of the State, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-2.

 

7.                  On April 15, 2005, IDEM issued a NPDES general permit, No. ING250096, to the Respondent under 327 IAC 15-8.  The permit was issued based on the notice of intent submitted by the Respondent to IDEM on March 22, 2005, for the discharge of the non-contact cooling water, which stated that the discharge does not contain any additives, or industrial waste.  It is not commingled with the sanitary sewer discharge and is only used as a heat exchanger for cooling purposes.

 

8.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, any person who operates, controls or maintains any mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the State, contain the spill, if possible, to prevent additional spilled material from entering the waters of the State; undertake or cause others to undertake activities needed to accomplish a spill response; and as soon as possible, but within two hours of discovery, communicate a spill report to the Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response.

 

9.                  Although the Respondent notified the City of Goshen, Indiana, that it was going to use “Zyglo” brand fluorescent powder dye to test for leaks in the non-contact cooling water discharge from the Site, IDEM considers the discharge of an unknown amount of non-contact cooling water discharged from the Site for an undetermined period of time, a reportable spill.  Also, IDEM considers that an approximately 3 – 4 ounces of “Zyglo” brand fluorescent powder dye, which was added to non-contact cooling water discharge to test for leaks in the system, that was discharged on or before November 10, 2004, and was not properly contained, and/or responded to, and/or reported to IDEM by the Respondent, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7.

 

10.             Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-30-2-1(1), no person may discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment or into any publicly owned treatment works in any form which causes or would cause pollution which violates or which would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

 

11.             The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of the non-contact cooling water containing “Zyglo” brand fluorescent powder dye, in amounts sufficient to be classified as a contaminant or waste, into the environment from the Site on or before November 10, 2004, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, and thus violating IC 13-30-2-1(1).

 

12.             Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), the following are minimum water quality conditions:

 

(1)               All waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges:

 

(A)              that will settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits;

(B)              that are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious;

(C)             that produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;

(D)             which are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants or humans

(E)              which are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such a degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.

 

13.             Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), a person may not discharge, emit, cause, allow or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment.

 

14.             Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of Indiana; or cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters; any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under sections 1 and 3 of this chapter.

 

15.             During IDEM's spill investigation at the Site on November 10, 2004, it was noted that non-contact cooling water containing “Zyglo” brand fluorescent powder dye had migrated off-site on or before November 10, 2004.  It was also noted that the Respondent’s discharge of the non-contact cooling water was on-going, which caused or contributed to the contamination of the waters of the State, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), and thus violating IC 13-30-2-1(1) and IC 13-18-4-5.

 

16.             On May 22, 2006, representatives of IDEM held a settlement conference with representatives of the Respondent.  At that conference, IDEM received a copy of the Respondent’s Spill Prevention, Control and Counter Measure Plan, which meets IDEM’s requirements under a spill response plan.

 

17.             In recognition of the settlement reached, the Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II. ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by the Complainant or his delegate, and has been received by the Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  Immediately upon the Effective Date, the Respondent shall maintain compliance with point source discharge requirements of 327 IAC 5-2-2; spill reporting requirements of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7; minimum water quality requirements of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), IC 13-30-2-1(1), IC 13-18-4-5, and its general permits for stormwater and non-contact cooling water.

 

3.                  The Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000).  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within 30 days of the Effective Date.

 

4.                  The civil penalty is payable by check to the Environmental Management Special Fund.  Payment shall include the Case Number, 2004-14477-W, of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Cashiers Office – Mail Code 50-10C

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

100 N. Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251

 

5.                  In the event that the civil penalty required by Order Paragraph 3, is not paid within 30 days of the Effective Date, the Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101.  The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

6.                  This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit, or a modification of an existing permit, nor shall it in any way relieve the Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable NPDES permit or with any other applicable federal or state law or regulation.

 

7.                  The Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that the Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, NPDES permit, federal or state law.

 

8.                  This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its successors and assigns.  The Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this document and legally bind the parties they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter their status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

9.                  In the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

10.             The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.  The Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

11.             This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until the Respondent has complied with terms and conditions of Paragraphs 3 through 5 of this Agreed Order and IDEM has issued a closeout letter to the Respondent.

 

 

The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.

 

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

Parker Hannifin Corporation

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Mark W. Stanifer, Chief

 

Printed:

 

 

Water Enforcement Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Enforcement

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Legal Counsel

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

 DAY OF

 

, 200

 

.

 

 

For The Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on June 20, 2006

 

Matthew T. Klein

 

Assistant Commissioner for

 

Compliance and Enforcement