STATE OF INDIANA

)

 

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT

 

)

SS:

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

COUNTY OF MARION

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT

)

OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

)

 

 

)

 

Complainant,

)

 

 

)

 

v.

)

Case No. 2004-14162-S

 

)

MATTINGLY PORK FARMS, INC.,

)

 

)

 

Respondent.

)

 

 

AGREED ORDER

 

The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.                  Respondent is Mattingly Pork Farms, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns/operates the Confined Feeding Operation (CFO), CFO Approval No. 4974, located at R. R. 2, Box 258, in Loogootee, Daviess County, Indiana ("Site").

 

3.                  The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”) has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.                  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, on November 4, 2004, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to:

Joseph L. Mattingly,
President and
Registered Agent
Mattingly Pork Farms, Inc.
R. R. 2,
Box 258
Loogootee, IN 47533

 

5.                  An inspection, on November 19, 2003, was conducted at the Site by a representative of IDEM's Office of Land Quality (OLQ).  The following violations were in existence or observed at the time of this inspection:

 

A.                 Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, any person who operates, controls or maintains any mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the state, contain the spill, if possible, to prevent additional spilled material from entering the waters of the state; undertake or cause others to undertake activities needed to accomplish a spill response; and as soon as possible, but within two hours of discovery, communicate a spill report to the Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response.

A reportable spill of animal manure from the Site into an unnamed tributary of Boggs Lake, waters of the state, occurred on or about November 19, 2003 and was not properly contained and responded to by the Respondent, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7.

 

B.                 Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), all waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges:

(A)              that will settle to form objectionable deposits;

(B)              that are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious;

(C)             that produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;

(D)             which are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants, or humans; and

(E)              which are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.


The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of animal manure from the Site on or about November 19, 2003, into an unnamed tributary of Boggs Lake, waters of the state, that settled to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits, that was in an amount sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious, that produced color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree to create a nuisance, which was in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants or humans and which was in concentrations or combinations that caused or contributed to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such a degree as to create a nuisance, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1).

 

C.                Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of this state, or to cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters, any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under IC 13-18-4-1 and IC 13-18-4-3.

The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of animal manure, an organic matter, from the Site on or about November 19, 2003, into an unnamed tributary of Boggs Lake, waters of the state, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1) and/or 327 IAC 5-2-2, and thus violated IC 13-18-4-5.

 

D.                Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the state as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid NPDES Permit obtained prior to the discharge.

The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of animal manure, a pollutant, from the Site on or about
November 19, 2003, into an unnamed tributary of Boggs Lake, waters of the state, without a valid NPDES permit and without meeting any of the exclusions in 327 IAC 5-2-4, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-2.

 

E.                 Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), no person may discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment or into any publicly owned treatment works in any form which causes or would cause pollution which violates or which would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of animal manure, a contaminant or waste, into the environment from the Site on or about November 19, 2003, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1) and/or 327 IAC 5-2-2, and thus violated IC 13-30-2-1(1).

 

F.                 Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-3-1(a), a confined feeding operation shall be managed to avoid an unpermitted discharge into waters of the state.

The Respondent did not manage the confined feeding operation to avoid an unpermitted discharge into an unnamed tributary of Boggs Lake, waters of the state, resulting in discharges of animal manure from the Site on or about November 19, 2003, into a tributary of Boggs Lake, waters of the state, without a valid permit, in violation of 327 IAC 16-3-1(a).

 

G.                Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-3-1(c), a confined feeding operation shall immediately take all reasonable steps to prevent spills or the discharge of manure in violation of the approval or 327 IAC 16 et seq., including seepage and leakage.

The Respondent failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent the spill or discharge of animal manure, on or about
November 19, 2003, from the Site, in violation of 327 IAC 16-3-1(c).

 

H.                 Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-5(a) the following information must be added to the operating record in accordance with required time frames established in 327 IAC 16 and IC 13-18-10, and must be maintained and updated in the operating record: all valid approvals, amendments, and notifications relevant to the approvals, the current manure management plan, and the current emergency spill response plan.

The Respondent, on or about November 19, 2003, did not add to the operating record in accordance with the required time frames established in 327 IAC 16 and IC 13-18-10 and failed to maintain and update in the operating record the current emergency spill response plan, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-5(a).

 

I.                     Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-5(b) the operating record must contain all applicable records from the following: 327 IAC 16-9-1(e) regarding completed self-monitoring records for three (3) years; 327 IAC 16-10-1, regarding minimum acreage records; 327 IAC 16-10-2(c), regarding land application records for five years; 327 IAC 16-10-5(c), regarding marketing and distribution records for three years; and documentation of any spill response implemented in accordance with 327 IAC 16-9-4(a)(3) by confined feeding operation personnel within the past five years.

The operating record of the Respondent on or about
November 19, 2003, did not contain all applicable records from 327 IAC 16-9-1(e) regarding completed self-monitoring records for three years, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-5(b).

 

J.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-1(a), all waste management systems and application equipment must be maintained and operated to meet the approval conditions.

On or about
November 19, 2003, the Respondent was not maintaining the waste management systems at the Site to meet approval conditions, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-1(a).

 

K.                 Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-1(b), management of liquid and solid manure must be in compliance with the following: (1) this article, (2) the confined feeding operation approval, and (3) all applicable state and federal laws.

On or about
November 19, 2003, the Respondent was not managing the liquid manure at the Site in compliance with the confined feeding operation approval and applicable state and federal laws, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-1(b).

 

L.                  Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-1(d), if uncovered, liquid manure storage structures must be maintained with a minimum freeboard of two (2) feet or as specified in the approval conditions.

On or about
November 19, 2003, the Respondent did not maintain a minimum freeboard of two (2) feet in the uncovered, liquid manure storage structure at the site, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-1(d).

 

M.                Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-1(f), uncovered liquid manure storage structures must have clearly identified markers to indicate manure levels relative to the approved freeboard elevation.

On or about
November 19, 2003, the Respondent did not have clearly identified markers in the uncovered liquid manure storage structures to indicate manure levels relative to the approved freeboard elevation, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-1(f).

 

N.                 Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-1(g), all earthen berms for manure storage structures must be stabilized with vegetation or alternative erosion control measures and be maintained to allow for visual inspections.

On or about November 19, 2003, the Respondent did not maintain the vegetation on the berm in a manner that would allow for visual inspections, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-1(g).

 

O.                Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-9-3(a), dead animal compost operations must have run-on and run-off control.

On or about
November 20, 2003, the Respondent did not have run-on and run-off controls at the dead animal compost area, in violation of 327 IAC 16-9-3(a).

 

6.                  The Respondent has depopulated the site and plans to close the swine operation.

 

7.                  In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective ("Effective Date") when it is approved by the Complainant or her delegate, and has been received by the Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  Respondent shall comply with 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, 327 IAC 2-1-6, 327 IAC 5-2-2, IC 13-30-2-1(1), IC 13-18-4-5, 327 IAC 16-3-1(a), 327 IAC 16-3-1(c), 327 IAC 16-9-5(a), 327 IAC 16-9-1(a), 327 IAC 16-9-1(b), 327 IAC 16-9-1(d), 327 IAC 16-9-1(f), 327 IAC 16-9-1(g), 327 IAC 16-9-5(b)(1) and 327 IAC 16-9-3 which Respondent was found to be in violation; as cited under “Findings of Facts”.

 

3.                  The manure storage structure closure, described in Attachment A, shall be performed in accordance with 327 IAC 16-11 and 327 IAC 16-13.

 

4.                  All submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless notified otherwise in writing, shall be sent to:

Craig Henry, Enforcement Case Manager
Office of Enforcement
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
100 N. Senate Avenue
P. O. Box 6015

Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015

 

5.                  Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Eleven Thousand Six Hundred ($11,600.00) Dollars.  Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of the Agreed Order, Respondent shall pay a portion of this penalty in the amount of Two Thousand Three Hundred Twenty ($2,320.00) Dollars.  Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund. In lieu of payment of the remaining civil penalty, Respondent shall perform and complete a Supplemental Environmental Project (“SEP”)(see Attachment A).  Respondent estimates that this SEP will cost Sixty One Thousand Two Hundred ($61,200.00) Dollars.  Within thirty (30) days of completing this SEP, Respondent shall submit written notice and documentation to IDEM which substantiates all actions taken and costs incurred with respect to the SEP.  In the event that the cost of the SEP is less than Eighteen Thousand Five Hundred Sixty ($18,560.00) Dollars, Respondent shall pay fifty percent (50%) of the difference between the proposed minimum cost of the SEP ($18,560.00) and the actual cost of the SEP.

As a Supplemental Environmental Project, Respondent shall close two (2) wastewater storage structures and convert a third wastewater storage structure to a fresh water pond.  The SEP project shall be completed no later than June 30, 2005.  Implementation of this SEP will eliminate the possibility that manure or wastewater from the site will impact waters of the state.

In the event that the Respondent does not complete the SEP by June 30, 2005, the full amount of the civil penalty as stated above, plus interest established by IC 24-4.6-1-101 on the remaining amount, less the portion of the civil penalty Respondent has already paid, will be due within fifteen (15) days from Respondent's receipt of IDEM’s notice to pay.  Interest, at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101, shall be calculated on the amount due from the date which is thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this Agreed Order until the full civil penalty is paid.

 

6.                  Civil penalties are payable by check to the Environmental Management Special Fund.  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

Cashier
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
100 N. Senate Avenue
P. O. Box 7060

Indianapolis, IN 46207-7060

 

7.                  In the event that the civil penalty required by Order paragraph No. 5 is not paid within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.

 

8.                  This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its successors and assigns. The Respondent's signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this document and legally bind the parties they represent.  No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.

 

9.                  In the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

10.              The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred.   Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.

 

11.              This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all terms and conditions of this Agreed Order.

 

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

Mattingly Pork Farms, Inc.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Paul Higginbotham

 

Printed:

 

 

Chief, Solid Waste/UST Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Enforcement

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Office of Legal Counsel

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 2005.

 

 

For The Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on May 5, 2005

 

Matthew T. Klein

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

for Compliance and Enforcement

 

 

Attachment A

 

SEP Project

 

1.                  SEP Project Description:  Three wastewater storage structures will be closed in accordance with Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) standard 360, 327 IAC 16-11 and 327 IAC 16-13.  Two of the structures will be permanently closed and the third structure will be converted to a fresh water pond.

 

2.                  SEP Category: Pollution Control

 

3.                  Environmental Benefit of SEP:  This project will result in the complete closure of an approved confined feeding operation.  The successful completion of the project will eliminate the possibility that manure or wastewater from the operation will impact waters of the state.

 

4.                  Projected Cost of SEP:

 

Cost of pumping and land applying manure:

$25,200.00

Cost to remove solids from the wastewater storage structures:

$36,000.00

Total

$61,200.00

 

5.                  Time Line for SEP:  The closure of the waste storage structures is reliant on the proper field and weather conditions.  The project will start when conditions are conducive for land application of the manure from the waste facilities.  Completion date is June 30, 2005.