STATE OF |
) |
|
BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT |
||
|
|||||
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT Complainant, v. STEEL DYNAMICS, INC., Respondent. |
) |
|
|||
AGREED ORDER
The
Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action
without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the
entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the
terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation
contained herein.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management, a department of the State of
2.
Respondent
is Steel Dynamics, Inc. (“Respondent”), which owns and operates the stationary
steel mill, Plant ID. No. 063-00037, located at
3.
The
Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”) has jurisdiction over
the parties and the subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, on May 19, 2005, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via
Certified Mail to:
Keith E. Busse,
President and Registered Agent |
Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
|
Ft. |
5.
Inspections
were conducted on April 7 and June 8, 2004 by a representative of IDEM’s Office of Air Quality (“OAQ”). The following violations were in existence or
observed at the time of these inspections:
a.
Pursuant
to 326 IAC 6-4-2(4), no source shall allow fugitive dust to visibly cross the
boundary or property line of a source.
On April 7, 2004, a representative of IDEM’s
OAQ conducted an inspection at this source.
At the time of the inspection, the inspector observed fugitive
emissions, generated by vehicle traffic, cross the property line at ground
level, a violation of 326 IAC 6-4-2(4).
b.
Pursuant
to Significant Source Modification (SSM) No. 063-16628-00037, operation
condition No. D.1.1(1), fugitive emissions generated at each electric arc
furnace (“EAF”) shall not exceed three percent (3%) opacity when emitted from
any roof monitor or building opening, based on a six (6) minute average as
determined in 326 IAC 5-1-4.
A representative of IDEM’s OAQ
conducted an inspection at the site on June 8, 2004. During this inspection the inspector observed
visible emissions emanating from the EAF and exiting through the roof monitor
above the ladle metallurgical station (“LMS”).
The inspector conducted visible emission evaluations (EPA test Method 9)
of these emissions and determined that during one six (6) minute averaging
period the opacity of these emissions exceeded the three percent (3%) limit, a
violation of SSM No. 063-16628-00037, operation condition No. D.1.1(1).
c.
Pursuant
to Significant Source Modification (SSM) No. 063-16628-00037, operation
condition No. D.1.3(c), visible emissions from the Meltshop
operations shall not exceed six percent (6%) opacity, based on a six (6) minute
average. This provision of the permit
incorporates the requirements of 40 CFR 60.272a(a)(3) which limits emissions
exiting a shop, due solely to the operations of any affected EAF or AOD vessel,
to six percent (6%) opacity.
A representative of IDEM’s OAQ
conducted an inspection at the site on June 8, 2004. During this inspection the inspector observed
visible emissions emanating from the EAF and exiting through the roof monitor
above the LMS. The inspector conducted
visible emission evaluations (EPA test Method 9) of these emissions and
determined that during one six (6) minute averaging period the opacity of these
emissions exceeded the six percent (6%) limit, a violation of SSM No. 063-16628-00037,
operation condition No. D.1.3(c) and 40 CFR 60.272a(a)(3).
d.
Pursuant
to SSM No. 063-16628-00037, operation condition No. D.9.1(b),
visible emissions from unpaved roadways shall not exceed ten percent (10%)
opacity.
A representative of IDEM’s OAQ conducted
an inspection at the site on June 8, 2004.
During this inspection the inspector observed visible emissions
emanating from vehicle traffic on unpaved roads. The inspector conducted visible emission
evaluations, as prescribed by operation condition D.9.4 of this SSM, of these
emissions and determined that the opacity of these emissions was in excess of
the ten percent (10%) limit, a violation of SSM No. 063-16628-00037, operation
condition No. D.9.1(b).
6.
In
recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to
administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (“Effective Date”) when it is approved by the
Complainant or his delegate, and has been received by the Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no force or
effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent
shall comply with all terms and conditions of SSM No. 063-16628-00037.
3.
Respondent
is assessed a civil penalty of Eight Thousand One Hundred Dollars
($8,100). Said penalty amount shall be
due and payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30)
days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order.
4.
Civil
penalties are payable by check to the Environmental Management Special
Fund. Checks shall include the Case Number
of this action and shall be mailed to:
Cashier –
Mail Code 50-10C |
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
|
|
5.
In
the event that the civil penalty required by Order paragraph 3 is not paid within
thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreed Order, Respondent shall
pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC
24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall
continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
6.
This
Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Respondent, its successors
and assigns. The Respondent’s
signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to
execute this document and legally bind the parties they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or
partnership status of the Respondent shall in any way alter its status or
responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
7.
In
the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
8.
The
Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any
subsequent owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors,
firms and other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the
terms of this Agreed Order.
9.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent complies with the terms of
Order paragraph No. 3.
REMAINDER
OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
TECHNICAL
RECOMMENDATION: |
|
RESPONDENT: |
|||||||||||
Department
of Environmental Management |
|
Steel
Dynamics, Inc. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||||||||
|
David P. McIver |
|
Printed: |
|
|||||||||
|
Chief,
Air Section |
|
Title: |
|
|||||||||
|
Office of
Enforcement |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
COUNSEL
FOR COMPLAINANT: |
|
COUNSEL
FOR RESPONDENT: |
|||||||||||
Department
of Environmental Management |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
By: |
|
|
By: |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Office of
Legal Counsel |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Date: |
|
|
Date: |
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT THIS |
|
DAY OF |
|
, 200 |
|
. |
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
For The
Commissioner: |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Signed on
May 12, 2006 |
||||||||||||
|
Matthew
T. Klein |
||||||||||||
|
Assistant
Commissioner for |
||||||||||||
|
Compliance
and Enforcement |
||||||||||||