STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION

)
)
)


SS:

BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 

COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,

Complainant,

v.

NEW SCHOONEBEEK DAIRY, L.L.C.,

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)






Case No. 2004-13723-S




 

AGREED ORDER

 

The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.  Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of any violation contained herein.  Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce this order.

 

I.  FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.         Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”) of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, a department of the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.

 

2.         Respondent is New Schoonebeek Dairy, L.L.C. (“Respondent”), which owns and operates a dairy farm, which constitutes a Confined Animal Feeding Operation (“CAFO”), located at 1858 East 800 South in LaFontaine, Wabash County, Indiana (“Site”).  Respondent has coverage, designated as NPDES Permit No. ING 806245, under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) General Permit Rule found at 327 IAC 15, for the Site.  In addition, Respondent previously held Confined Feeding Operation Approval # AW 5259 for the Site.

 

3.         The Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action.

 

4.         Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, on June 16, 2004, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation via Certified Mail to:

 

H. J. H. Bekel

Registered Agent

New Schoonebeek Dairy, L.L.C.

1858 E. C. R. 800 S.

La Fontaine, IN 46940

 

5.         Inspections, on October 7 and December 9, 2003, were conducted at the Site by a representative of IDEM's Office of Land Quality (OLQ).  The following violations were in existence or observed at the time of these inspections:

 

A.        Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, any person who operates, controls or maintains any mode of transportation or facility from which a spill occurs shall, upon discovery of a reportable spill to the soil or surface waters of the state, contain the spill, if possible, to prevent additional spilled material from entering the waters of the state; undertake or cause others to undertake activities needed to accomplish a spill response; and as soon as possible, but within two hours of discovery, communicate a spill report to the Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response.

 

Reportable spills of silage leachate from the Site into an unnamed ditch, waters of the state, occurred on or about October 7 and December 9, 2003, and were not properly contained and/or responded to and/or reported by the Respondent, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7.

 

B.        Pursuant to 327 IAC 2-1-6(a), all waters at all times and at all places, including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges:

 

(A)              that will settle to form objectionable deposits; (B) that are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious;

(B)              that produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;

(C)              which are in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants, or humans; and

(D)              which are in concentrations or combinations that will cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such degree as to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses.

 

The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of silage leachate from the Site on or about October 7 and December 9, 2003, into an unnamed ditch, waters of the state, that settled to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable deposits, that was in an amount sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious, that produced color, visible oil sheen, odor, or other conditions in such degree to create a nuisance and was in amounts sufficient to be acutely toxic to, or otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals, plants or humans, in violation of 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1).

 

C.                Pursuant to 327 IAC 5-2-2, any discharge of pollutants into waters of the state as a point source discharge, except for exclusions made in 327 IAC 5-2-4, is prohibited unless in conformity with a valid NPDES Permit obtained prior to the discharge.

 

The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of silage leachate, a pollutant, from the Site on or about October 7 and December 9, 2003, into an unnamed ditch, waters of the state, without a valid NPDES permit and without meeting any of the exclusions in 327 IAC 5-2-4, in violation of 327 IAC 5-2-2.

 

D.                Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of this state, or to cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters, any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under IC 13-18-4-1 and IC 13-18-4-3.

 

The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of silage leachate, an organic matter, from the Site on or about October 7 and December 9, 2003, into an unnamed ditch, waters of the state, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), 327 IAC 16-3-1(a), 327 IAC 16-4-2(1), and/or 327 IAC 5-2-2, and thus violated IC 13-18-4-5.

 

E.                 Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), no person may discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment or into any publicly owned treatment works in any form which causes or would cause pollution which violates or which would violate rules, standards, or discharge or emission requirements adopted by the appropriate board under the environmental management laws.

 

The Respondent caused and/or allowed the discharge of silage leachate, a contaminant or waste, into the environment from the Site on or about October 7 and December 9, in violation of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, 327 IAC 2-1-6(a) (1), 327 IAC 16-3-1(a), 327 IAC 16-4-2(1)and/or 327 IAC 5-2-2, and thus violated IC 13-30-2-1(1).

 

F.                 Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-3-1(a), a confined feeding operation shall be managed to avoid an unpermitted discharge into waters of the state.

 

The Respondent did not manage the confined feeding operation to avoid an unpermitted discharge into waters of the state, resulting in discharges of silage leachate from the Site on or about October 7, and December 9, 2003, into an unnamed ditch, waters of the state, without a valid permit, in violation of 327 IAC 16-3-1(a).

 

G.                Pursuant to 327 IAC 16-4-2(1), the owner/operator must comply with all terms and conditions of the approval and this article.

 

The Respondent placed haylage and silage on the storage pad, on or about July 9, 2003, prior to installation of the leachate management system, in violation of  327 IAC 16-4-2(1) and approval condition # 25 of CFO approval # AW 5259.

 

6.                  On October 15, 2003, IDEM issued the Respondent a general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.

 

7.                  An inspection on October 11, 2006, revealed improvements to the silage leachate management system, including installation of a silage leachate pond, removal of the silage leachate overflow, and grading and seeding to control erosion have been completed.

 

8.                  In recognition of the settlement reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.

 

II.  ORDER

 

1.                  This Agreed Order shall be effective ("Effective Date") when it is approved by the Complainant or his delegate, and has been received by the Respondent.  This Agreed Order shall have no force or effect until the Effective Date.

 

2.                  Respondent shall comply with the applicable portions of 327 IAC 2-6.1-7, 327 IAC 2-1-6, 327 IAC 5-2-2, IC 13-30-2-1, IC 13-18-4-5 and 327 IAC 15-15-4(b).

 

3.                  Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of Twenty One Thousand ($21,000.00) Dollars.  The civil penalty shall be paid in the following manner:

 

a.         Respondent shall make four (4) equal quarterly payments of Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty ($5,250.00) Dollars each to the Environmental Management Special Fund on or before January 1, 2007, April 1, 2007, July 1, 2007 and October 1, 2007.

 

b.         If IDEM determines at any time during the effective period of this Agreed Order that the Respondent has failed to comply with any conditions of this Agreed Order, subject to any extension granted by IDEM, the Respondent agrees to pay the entire unpaid balance of the twenty-one thousand dollar ($21,000.00) civil penalty to the Environmental Management Special Fund within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice to pay by IDEM.

 

4.                  Civil penalties are payable by check to the Environmental Management Special Fund.  Checks shall include the Case Number of this action and shall be mailed to:

 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Cashier’s Office        Mail Code 50-10C

100 N. Senate Avenue

Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251

 

5.                  In the event that each installment payment of the civil penalty required by Order paragraph No. 3 is not paid on or before the due date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall continue to accrue until the payment is paid in full.

 

6.                  In the event that any terms of the Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.

 

7.                  This Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing permit.  This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable permit or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.

 

8.                  Complainant does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.  Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.

 

9.                  Nothing in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement action.  IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with the EPA or any other agency or entity.

 

10.             This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent complies with Order Paragraph Nos. 3 through 5 of this Agreed Order.

 

REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

 

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION:

 

RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

New Schoonebeek Dairy, L.L.C.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

Janet Arnold

 

Printed:

 

 

Chief, Solid Waste/UST Section

 

Title:

 

 

Office of Enforcement

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:

Department of Environmental Management

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Legal Counsel

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT THIS

 

DAY OF

 

, 2007.

 

 

For The Commissioner:

 

 

 

Signed on January 12, 2007

 

Robert B. Keene

 

Assistant Commissioner

 

Office of Legal Counsel and Enforcement