STATE OF INDIANA ) BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT
) SS: OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COUNTY OF MARION )
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT )
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, )
)
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2002-11323-W
)
MOORESVILLE PARTNERS AT FIELDS )
CROSSING, LLC )
)
Respondent. )
AGREED ORDER
The Complainant and the Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the following Findings of Fact and Order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
IC 13-13-1-1.
Charles A. Augustin, Jr., President and to: Bruce E. Smith, Registered Agent
Olympia Partners, LTD. Olympia Partners, LTD.
320 N. Meridian St., Suite 700 50 S. Meridian St., Suite 700
Indianapolis, IN 46204 Indianapolis, IN 46204
5. Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-7(b), the following requirements for erosion control measures shall be met on the Site during the period when land disturbing activities occur:
(1) Sediment-laden water shall be detained on-site by erosion control practices that minimize sedimentation in the receiving stream.
(2) Appropriate measures shall be taken to minimize or eliminate wastes or unused building materials being carried from the site by run-off.
(3) Sediment tracked from the site onto public or private roadways shall be minimized.
(4) Public and private roadways shall be kept clear of accumulated sediment.
(5) All on-site storm drains shall be protected against sedimentation by appropriate and acceptable methods.
(6) Storm water drainage from adjacent areas that naturally pass through the site shall either be diverted from disturbed areas or the existing channel must be protected or improved to prevent erosion and sedimentation from occurring.
(7) Run-off from a disturbed area shall be controlled by either appropriate vegetative practices, the implementation of an erosion control plan that includes appropriate erosion control measures, or both.
6. Pursuant to 327 IAC 15-5-7(c), during the period of construction at the Site, all erosion control measures necessary to meet the requirements of this rule shall be maintained by the operator.
7. Based on site visits and inspections conducted by IDNR and the Morgan County SWCD, the Respondent failed to assure that erosion control measures were implemented and maintained at the Site from January 9, 2001, to February 19, 2002, and failed to assure that off-site sedimentation did not occur during the period of construction activity as observed during inspections conducted on August 24, 2001, September 6, 2001, November 30, 2001, and February 19, 2002. Specifically, the following violations of 327 IAC 15-5-7(b) and (c) were in existence at the time of the site visits/inspections:
(1) Sediment-laden water was not detained on-site by erosion control practices that minimize sedimentation in the receiving stream, and appropriate measures were not taken to minimize or eliminate wastes or unused building materials being carried from the site by run-off, as noted during inspections conducted on January 9, 2001, January 31, 2001, May 18, 2001, July 2, 2001, August 24, 2001, September 6, 2001, November 30, 2001, and February 19, 2002.
(2) Sediment tracked from the site onto public or private roadways was not minimized, and public and private roadways were not kept clear of accumulated sediment, as noted during inspections conducted on July 2, 2001, and November 30, 2001.
(3) All on-site storm drains were not protected against sedimentation by appropriate and acceptable methods, as noted during inspections conducted on January 31, 2001, July 2, 2001, August 24, 2001, and November 30, 2001.
(4) Run-off from the disturbed area was not controlled by either appropriate vegetative practices, the implementation of an erosion control plan that includes appropriate erosion control measures, or both, as noted during inspections conducted on January 9, 2001, January 31, 2001, August 24, 2001, September 6, 2001, November 30, 2001, and February 19, 2002.
(5) During the period of construction at the Site, all erosion control measures necessary to meet the requirements of this rule were not maintained by the operator, as noted during inspections conducted on January 9, 2001, January 31, 2001, July 2, 2001, August 24, 2001, September 6, 2001, November 30, 2001, and February 19, 2002.
8. Pursuant to IC 13-18-4-5, it is unlawful for any person to throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams or waters of Indiana; or cause, permit, or suffer to be thrown, run, drained, allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters; any organic or inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any waters, as determined by a rule of the board adopted under sections 1 and 3 of this chapter.
9. The Respondent caused or contributed to a polluted condition of waters of the state by causing the discharge of sediment from the Site into waters of Indiana as noted during inspections conducted on August 24, 2001, September 6, 2001, November 30, 2001, and February 19, 2002, in violation of IC 13-18-4-5.
10. An inspection conducted by IDNR and Morgan County SWCD staff on June 7, 2002 indicated that the site had been brought into compliance with the provisions of 327 IAC 15-5.
11. In recognition of the settlement reached, the Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order
II. ORDER
The inspections and their results shall be documented in a log maintained for documentation and review purposes. Information in the log shall include, but not be limited to, the date and time of inspection, results/observations found during the inspection, and any corrective measures conducted as a result of deficiencies found during the inspection. The log shall be maintained on site so that it is available for review. For the purposes of this provision, a "rainfall event" is defined as any precipitation or precipitation runoff event that is equal to or greater than 0.1 inches of precipitation. This requirement will remain in effect for the term of this Agreed Order.
Order Paragraph Number |
Violation |
Penalty Amount |
2 & 3 |
Failure to implement adequate erosion and sediment control measures, failure to ensure that all erosion and sediment control measures are properly installed and maintained and in the event that deficiencies are found, implement corrective measures, and/or failure to inspect the site and document an inspection as required. |
$500 per each week |
Cashier
IDEM
100 N. Senate Avenue
P. O. Box 7060
Indianapolis, IN 46207-7060
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: RESPONDENT:
Department of Environmental Management Mooresville Partners at Fields Crossing LLC
By: _________________________ By: _________________________
Mark W. Stanifer, Chief
Water Enforcement Section Printed: ______________________
Office of Enforcement
Title: ________________________
Date: ________________________ Date: ________________________
COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT: COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:
Department of Environmental Management
By: _________________________ By: ________________________
Michael Byron, Attorney
Office of Legal Counsel
The Department of Environmental Management
Date: _______________________ Date: ______________________
APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT THIS _____ DAY OF _______________, 2002.
For the Commissioner:
__Signed 1/14/03______
Felicia A. Robinson
Deputy Commissioner
for Legal Affairs