|
| Display Month: |
|
|
|
|
|
| From: |

|
|
|
| To: |

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entry Type:
|
(View Selection)
|
|
|
Entry Category:
|
(View Selection)
|
|
|
IN.gov Category:
|
(View Selection)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submit
|
|
| |
|
| [SUPREME] Cortney L. Schwartz v. Jodi S. Heeter, Cause No. 02S03-1301-DR-18 |
|
| Start Date: | 4/11/2013 | Start Time: | 9:45 AM |
| End Date: | 4/11/2013 | End Time: | 10:25 AM |
|
Entry Description The marital settlement agreement reached by the parties in this case included a “true up” provision for child support intended to account for fluctuations in Father’s annual income. When a post-dissolution dispute arose regarding interpretation of this provision, the trial court held that the provision contemplated application of the version of the Child Support Guidelines in effect during the income year in question. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, a majority holding that the provision contemplated application of the 2009 Guidelines in effect when the agreement was made. http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/09131201lmb.pdf " target="_blank">Schwartz v. Heeter, 970 N.E.2d 197, clarified and aff’d on reh’g, 975 N.E.2d 820 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012), vacated. The Supreme Court has granted a petition to transfer the case and has assumed jurisdiction over the appeal. |
|
Entry Category: Oral Arguments |
IN.gov Category: Law & Justice |
Agency Name Courts, Indiana |
|
|
|
by RSS or Email
YouTube Channel
photos on Flickr