|
| Display Month: |
|
|
|
|
|
| From: |

|
|
|
| To: |

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entry Type:
|
(View Selection)
|
|
|
Entry Category:
|
(View Selection)
|
|
|
IN.gov Category:
|
(View Selection)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submit
|
|
| |
|
| [SUPREME] Dante Adams v. State of Indiana, Cause No. 15A01-1110-MI-537 |
|
| Start Date: | 3/28/2013 | Start Time: | 9:45 AM |
| End Date: | 3/28/2013 | End Time: | 10:25 AM |
|
Entry Description The State filed a motion to transfer cash seized from Dante Adams to federal authorities for the purpose of commencing forfeiture proceedings. The State did not serve the motion on Adams. The Dearborn Circuit Court granted the State's motion and denied Adams' motion for rehearing. The Court of Appeals concluded that because the statute permitting the State to transfer seized property to federal authorities contemplates a lawful search, Adams was entitled to challenge the legality of the search and seizure prior to transfer of the cash to federal authorities. The State therefore erred in failing to give Adams notice of its motion. The error, however, was harmless because Adams could not show prejudice. http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/05211201ewn.pdf" target="_blank">Adams v. State, 967 N.E.2d 568 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). Adams has petitioned the Supreme Court to accept jurisdiction over the appeal. |
|
Entry Category: Oral Arguments |
IN.gov Category: Law & Justice |
Agency Name Courts, Indiana |
|
|
|
by RSS or Email
YouTube Channel
photos on Flickr